Exposing the Zionist thought police on the internet will get you banned

[Maasanova]

Maasanova,

It all started with national attention from a shocking You Tube video of Israelis and American Jews expressing their disdain for President Obama. The controversial video, hosted by Mondoweiss and produced by Max Blumenthal and Joseph Dana Philip Weiss, quickly went viral on the internet. Many American websites tried to ignore the video and other sites, like the Huffington Post went so far as censoring the video; citing it as "unnewsorthy." The video took on a life of its own and soon the video makers were accused of being agenda driven, self-hating Jews, Israel bashers, stoking anti-Semitism, and even being anti-Semitic. Ultimately, the Zionist thought police said "enough" and amid great protest from Jewish peace activists, the video was removed. Blumenthal suspects a Jewish conspiracy:

Youtube has removed my video, “Feeling The Hate In Jerusalem,” on the baseless grounds that it contains “inappropriate content.” They have offered me no further explanation and have stonewalled my inquiries and attempts to rectify the situation. Thus they have censored a video that contains far less inflammatory content than thousands of video they are already hosting. Why? I won’t ascribe motives to Youtube I am unable to confirm, but it is clear there is an active campaign by right-wing Jewish elements to suppress the video by filing a flood of complaints with Youtube. At the same time these elements have attempted to paint me as a self-hating Jew determined to foment anti-Semitism. I answered this last charge to Ha’aretz (read the barely coherent article here) last week: “I have received death threats from people, mainly ones calling me a self-hating Jew. I am self-hating, but my self-hatred has nothing to do with me being Jewish.”

On June 7, 2009 I made a YouTube response video to "Feeling the Hate in Jeruslam", where I attempted to expose the outright hypocrisy of Zionist thought police, the Anti-Defamation League. I posted it here at Under The Radar Media and What Really Happened, along with other alternative websites and blogs linked to my video, giving it a fair amount attention although nowhere near as many views as Blumenthal's version. On June 26, 2009 I received an e-mail from YouTube which explained that they had received a complaint about my response video. Here is the e-mail I received:

This is to notify you that we have received a privacy complaint from an individual regarding your content: -------------------------------------------------------------
Video URLs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GomRi-qy6XA
-------------------------------------------------------------
We would like to give you an opportunity to remove or edit your video so
that it no longer violates the privacy of the individuals involved. Please
edit or remove the material reported by the individual within 48 hours of
today's date. If no action is taken, the video will then come in for
review by the YouTube staff and be prohibited from being uploaded again.

Protecting a person's privacy is protecting their personal safety. When
uploading videos in the future, please remember not to post someone else's
image or personal information without their consent. Personal information
includes things such as names, phone numbers and email addresses. For more
information, please review our Community Guidelines.

If you've seen my video then you'll know that the claim the claim of violating someones privacy is, at least in my view, is patently untrue. But the censorship didn't stop there. I decided to post the video at a very mainstream political forum where I have been a member for years. Within minutes my post was removed and by the next day I was banned and was politely asked not to return.

And twelve hours later...

[Marklar]

Yeah, it's pretty rediculous. I wonder if the same applies to an ADL video that shows a KKK rally? Exposing racism is obviously racist now right?

,....* was just a dumb joke, as if even here I was cutoff and censored before I could mention the super-forbidden subject. I really had no subject in mind, just my warped sense of humor acting up.

[Maasanova]

Marklar what is,....*?

I just love the mental gymnastics that the moderator had to use to justify calling me a racist! I mean I know my post was very inflammatory and extreme, but to calling this "hate speech" is pretty insane IMO. I don't hate anyone, I don't even hate the Zionists.

[Marklar]

Y'know what will get you banned even quicker is,....*

[Tara]

And it has nothing to do with race. It has all to do with hate!!!! These so-called do gooders (ADL) trying to help out races and those that are oppressed, more times than not are the oppressers and haters themselves. What a f-ing joke?

[Tara]

The truth is the few in power right now govern the many and they don't want the many to realize how corrupt and evil they are because if they do a revolution would happen overnight.

[Maasanova]

Well the Muslims have their own internet thought police too, but it's nowhere near as powerful or far-reaching as the Zio thought police. But you are right, Muslim bashing videos, or the bashing of any other group are allowed to stay up no problem.

They are horrified of the truth coming out about their various scams and their afraid of their compartmentalized technicians wising up to what is going on. It's happening though, and very quickly, but at the rate we're going it's not happening fast enough.

If the ADL get their hate crimes and cyber-bullying laws in place I think we are going to be finished.

[Tara]

Wow, the lengths they will go to save themselves from themselves! You know if this was Muslims going off on another religion/race this would be left up on youtube to be viewed. The bias is sickening! What are they afraid of? That is the question of the day.